In compressed air systems, piping selection plays a critical role in energy efficiency, system reliability, and long-term operating cost. Traditionally, GI (Galvanized Iron) piping has been widely used, but with increasing energy costs and maintenance challenges, industries are now evaluating modern alternatives.

This case study compares traditional GI piping with Aluminium modular piping (QuickAir) under identical operating conditions to evaluate performance, pressure loss, and energy efficiency.

Parameter Specification
Pipe Length
500 meters
Air Flow
500 CFM
Pipe Diameter
50 mm
Operating Pressure
~7 bar
Operation
Continuous industrial use

CHALLENGES

High Energy Consumption

Small pressure losses across long pipe runs force compressors to work harder, increasing power usage.

Rising Operating Costs

Increased energy demand directly results in higher electricity and maintenance costs.

SOLUTIONS

GI Piping System

Rough internal surface that worsens over time due to corrosion.Threaded joints prone to leakage

Aluminium Modular Piping

Smooth internal bore with non-corrosive aluminium.Modular, leak-tight connections

CHALLENGES

High Energy Consumption

Small pressure losses across long pipe runs force compressors to work harder, increasing power usage.

Rising Operating Costs

Increased energy demand directly results in higher electricity and maintenance costs.

SOLUTIONS

GI Piping System

Rough internal surface that worsens over time due to corrosion.Threaded joints prone to leakage

Aluminium Modular Piping

Smooth internal bore with non-corrosive aluminium.Modular, leak-tight connections

Parameter GI Pipe Aluminium Pipe (QuickAir)
Internal Surface
Rough, corrodes over time
Smooth, non-corrosive
Joint Type
Threaded (leak-prone)
Modular, leak-tight
Pressure Drop / 100 m
~0.18–0.20 bar
~0.10–0.12 bar
Total Pressure Drop / 500 m
~0.9–1.0 bar
~0.5–0.6 bar